THOMAS JEFFERSON, ESQ.
DEAR SIR, - As you take a lively interest in every discovery which may be
of use to America, I will communicate one I have made, and on which I have
finished some very satisfactory experiments, that promise important aid
in enabling us to enforce a respect for our commerce, if not a perfect liberty
of the seas. My researches on torpedoes led me to reflections on firing
guns under water, and it is about a month since I commenced a suit of experiments.
FIRST EXPERIMENT:
A gun 2 feet long, 1 inch diameter, was loaded with a lead ball and one
ounce of powder; I put a tin tube to the touch-hole, made it water-tight,
and let it under water 3 feet. Before it I placed a yellow-pine plank, 4
inches thick, 18 inches from the muzzle. On firing, the ball went through
the 18 inches of water and the plank. When the gun is loaded as usual, a
tompkin or plug is put in the muzzle, to keep the water out of the barrel,
as at A. In this experiment the gun being immersed, with the pressure of
three feet of water on all its parts, that circumstance might be assigned
as a reason for its not bursting. It then became necessary to try the effect
with the muzzle in water and the breech in air.
SECOND EXPERIMENT:
I procured a common wine pipe and inserted the gun, loaded as before, into
one end, near the bottom; the muzzle in the wine pipe 6 inches, the breech
out 18 inches. The pipe was then filled with water to the bunghole, having
a head of water of 2 feet 3 inches above the gun, and a body of water three
feet long, through which the bullet had to pass. I then placed the opposite
end of the pipe against a yellow-pine post, in such manner that if the ball
went through the water and pipe, it should enter the post. 1 fired. The
ball passed through the three feet of water, the end of the pipe, and 7
inches into the post; the cask was blown to pieces, the gun not injured.
THIRD EXPERIMENT:
I obtained a cannon, - a 4-pounder, - for which I cast a lead ball that
weighed 6 pounds 2 ounces; the charge 1.5 pounds of powder. I placed it
under water 4 feet, fired at a target distant 12 feet. The ball passed through
the 12 feet of water, and a yellow-pine log 15 inches thick; the gun not
injured.
FOURTH EXPERIMENT:
I put an air box round the same cannon, except one foot of the muzzle, so
that the muzzle might be in water, the breech in air, then let it under
water 4 feet, and fired as before through 12 feet of water and 15 inches
of yellow-pine; gun not injured.
FIFTH EXPERIMENT:
I ordered a frame to be made of two pine logs, each 13 inches square, 45
feet long, on one end of which I placed a columbiad carrying a ball 9 inches
diameter, 100 pounds weight. On the other end I erected a target 6 feet
square, 3 feet thick, of seasoned, sound oak, braced and bolted very strong,
thus.
The columbiad, except two feet of the muzzle, was in an air box, the
muzzle 24 feet 6 inches from the target, the charge of powder 10 pounds.
When fired, the ball entered only 9 inches, - that is, its diameter, - into
the oak; the columbiad not injured. This experiment proved the range of
24 feet 6 inches through the water to be too great.
SIXTH EXPERIMENT:
I took away the columbiad and box, and put a 24-pounder in its place, loaded
with 9 pounds of powder, the muzzle 22 feet from the target. On firing,
it entered the target only its diameter, - that is, about 6 inches. Without
mathematical experience, the conclusion would have been that the 24-pounder,
having a quantity of powder equal to near one half the weight of the ball,
and the ball, 5.5 inches diameter, presenting little more than one third
the resistance to the water and wood that was presented by the 9-inch ball,
it should have entered further into the target. It did not; momentum was
wanting.
SEVENTH EXPERIMENT:
I loaded the columbiad with 12 pounds of powder, and placed the muzzle
6 feet from the target, the muzzle of the gun 2 feet under water; the place
where the ball struck the target 5 feet under water.
In this case, the ball went through the target 3 feet thick, and where is
not known; the target was torn to pieces. In this experiment I fortunately
proved beyond a doubt that columbiads can drive balls of one hundred pounds
weight through six feet of water and the side of a first rate man-of-war.
On examining Doctor Hutton's experiments and theory of projectiles in air,
and comparing the density of air with water, the theory is that the columbiad
fired might have been 10 feet from the target; the ball would then have
struck with a velocity of 650 feet a second, and have passed through 3 feet
of oak. Had the columbiad been 16 feet long, and made of a strength to fire
with 20 pounds of powder, the range might have been 15 feet through water.
But I will take the medium distance of 10 feet, and then the first undeniable
principle is, that one vessel can range alongside of another within 10,
or 6, or even 5 feet, when giving the broadside of only two 9-inch balls
through the side of the enemy, 8 feet below her water-line. The water would
rush in with a velocity of 16 feet in a second, and sink her in 20 or 30
minutes; but from what I have seen in this sluggish kind of shot, I believe
if they were put in about 5 feet from each other they would destroy timbers
between the two points of shock, and open a space of many square feet, as
thus. To put this discovery of submarine firing into practice against the
enemy, I have invented a mode for placing my columbiads in ships, from 4
to 8 feet below the water-line, as in the following drawing.
My guns are to be cast with two rims round the muzzle, thus. The space
a, b, to be woulded with hemp, and covered with thick leather; the gun then
forms a piston like that of a steam-engine or the piston of a forcing-pump.
The gun so prepared, there is a brass cylinder, with a strong head, cast,
and bored, and bolted in the side of the vessel. When, as in Figure 8, the
gun is run into this cylinder, it fits it exactly as the piston does a pump;
then if the caliber of the gun be 9 inches diameter, there must be a hole
through the bottom of the cylinder of Ii inches, as at C, to let the bullet
pass, which hole is covered with a strong sliding valve, the axis of which
comes inside of the vessel, as at D; when the gun is run into the cylinder
and ready to be fired, the valve opens. On firing, the gun recoils, shuts
the valve, and stops out the water. Thus my guns can be loaded and fired
under the water-line with near the same ease they are now worked above the
water-line. My present idea is to have four columbiads on each side of a
vessel, and two in her bow, so that, whether she runs bow or side on to
the enemy, the bullets must pass through her, as in Figure 9. You will observe,
in these sketches, that not using guns above the water-line, I have no port-holes,
and the sides above the water may be 7 or 8 feet thick, of pine logs, which
renders them not only bullet-proof; but the vessel so buoyant that she cannot
be sunk in this manner. My men who work the guns are out of danger under
the waterline, and those who steer or work the sails are guarded by walls
of wood, as A, B, Figure 6. For harbour defence, and perhaps finally for
service, I have combined a steam-engine with this kind of vessel, to bring
her up to the enemy in a calm, or light breezes. In harbours I would not
use masts or rigging; there would be nothing to shoot away, nor to hold
by in case of attempts at boardage; and in such case, as my deck would not
be wanted for fighting or any other purpose, while in action I could make
it inclined to twenty-five degrees, and slush it so that boarders could
not keep their feet, but must slide into the water, they not having a pin
or rope to hold by. The steam-engine would give a vessel of this description
the means of playing around the enemy, to take choice of position on her
bow or quarter, and with little or no risk sink everything that came into
our waters.
For sea service we must depend more on numbers, of which the calculations
are in favour of my plan, - A seventy-four will cost $600,000, and then
the seventy-four of an enemy is equal to her in power. The enemy also have
such fleets as will enable them to bring two to one; therefore the chances
are against us. For $600,000 I can build seven vessels. Were they to attack
a seventy-four, she could not dismast the whole of them; some one must get
within the range of eight or ten feet of her, where one fire from any one
of them would certainly destroy her. This changes the chances seven to one
in our favour, and against the enemy, for the same capital expended.
This represents the seven vessels bearing down on an enemy. Here it is
obvious that she cannot bring her guns to bear on more than one or two of
them; if she lies to to fight, they must surround her; but if she sails
better than any of them, and runs away, our object is gained, for then she
can be driven off the ocean into port. As columbiads of 9-inch caliber are
tremendous engines for close quarters, I could have two on pivots and circular
carriages within my wooden walls, as thus, which being loaded with semi-shot
and chains twenty feet long, would at two hundred yards distance, while
bearing down, cut her rigging, and disable her before coming to close action.
We are now engaged in a war for principles important to our independence
and interest as an active and great commercial nation, and if we fail, generations
to come must contend for it until they succeed. At all events, millions
must be expended, which, if as successful as our present hope, will fall
far short of the liberty of the seas. In expectation to discover in the
concealed magazines of science some certain mode for destroying military
navies, and thereby establishing a perfect liberty of the seas, I have Iaboured
at intervals with much ardour for thirteen years. I now submit to your reflections
whether I have found it. My present impression, and Commodore Decatur's,
is that I have. This is also the opinion of many friends. For you will consider,
that if those vessels can destroy such as now exist, they cannot be used
against each other without both parties going to the bottom; and such war
cannot be made, - as duels would never be fought if both parties were obliged
to sit on a cask of powder, and ignite it with a quick match.
Two millions of dollars would build twenty such vessels; sixty men to
each would be sufficient. Total, twelve hundred men. Such a fleet would
clear our coast; and the probability is it would be the most powerful fleet
in the world. One, however, should be built by Government, to establish
principles on the public mind which are already proved in private. On the
whole of this subject, after you have maturely reflected, it will give me
great pleasure to have your opinions; and if it coincides with mine, your
influence at Washington may be necessary to carry it into effect. I sincerely
hope this new art may give many pleasing hours to your evening of life.
As this wish is from the heart, it is better than the usual unmmeaning compliments
with which letters are concluded.
I, Robert Fulton, give the following specification of my invention for
injuring or destroying ships and vessels of war, by igniting gunpowder below
a line horizontal to the surface of the water, or so that the explosion
which causes injury to the vessel attacked shall be under water. Therefore,
instead of having the cannon and port-holes of a ship or vessel of war as
usual, above the surface of the water, I place my cannon so low in the vessel
that their port-holes will be below the surface of the water any number
of inches or feet which may be required, from six inches to four, six, ten,
or more feet; and thus, the cannon being fired with its muzzle under water,
the bullets will pass through the water instead of through air, and through
the sides of the enemy, from one to ten or more feet below the water-line,
which, letting in the water in quantity according to the size of the holes
and their depth under the surface, will sink the vessel attacked.
represents the mechanism by which a cannon may be loaded inside of a
ship, its muzzle be presented to hole in the side of the ship below the
water-line, then be fired, its ball pass out through water, the cannon recoil
into the ship, and the porthole shut without letting in any inconvenient
quantity of water. The gun may again be loaded and fired as before.
For this purpose a ring or flange is cast round the cannon, near its muzzle,
which may be filled in with hemp like the packing of the piston of a steam-engine,
or with leather, like the piston of a pump; a strong cylinder of brass or
iron, or the most fit metal for the water in which it is to be used, is
to be neat and smoothly bored, like the air-pump or cylinder of a steam-engine,
and of a size exact to receive the muzzle of the cannon, with its before-mentioned
packing; hence, when the muzzle is pushed into the cylinder, it will be
air and water tight, like the piston of a forcing-pump. The cylinder may
b~ one, two, or more feet long, as the use may require; on its outer end
a strong head and flange cast, which flange receives screw-bolts, to fasten
it tight in the side of the vessel. In the centre of the said head there
is a hole two inches in diameter greater than the caliber of the cannon
to be used for the cylinder. The cannon being run home until its muzzle
touches the head of the cylinder, as in the drawing, the cover to the hole
is to be turned to one side, and the cannon fired, the ball and charge passing
through the hole. On the recoil of the cannon, the sliding piece which covers
the hole will descend and stop out the water. On this plan the cannon may
be mounted on a carriage with wheels or not, as future experience may prove
best, and always recoil, and be worked in a line direct to the cylinder
which is to receive the muzzle. In my experience so far, when the cannon
is loaded as usual, I put a kind of tompkin or stopper in the muzzle, with
canvas and white lead to keep the water out of the gun. Thus I have found
the gun to fire perfectly well without any risk or accident. Although this
mode may be good in practice, I do not positively know that the water might
not be admitted into the gun, up to a water-tight wad. The first plan will
do; the latter may be proved in future practice. Cannon may be thus arranged
under the water-line in such vessels of war as are usually built; but as
the whole battery comes below water, and may be several feet below, the
vessel above the water-line may be made five, six, or more feet thick, of
pine logs or other wood, of hay or cotton or old rope or cabbage-tree, or
any kind of material which will be bullet-proof. Thus all the men will be
out of danger, as in the drawing. Cannon may be placed in the bow of a vessel,
near the keel as in drawing, or suspended over the bow or sides as in drawings,
and be fired with water-proof locks, constructed for common or fulminating
powder. Various other modes of practice may be devised; hut the whole merit
of this invention consists in having discovered and proved that cannon can
be fired to greater advantage for the destruction or annoyance of an enemy,
when so placed that the muzzle shall be under water, and the ball pass through
water for the whole or greater part of the space it has to go till it strikes
the enemy. The practice then will be with strong bullet-proof vessels to
run alongside of an enemy within thirty, twenty, or ten feet, give her a
broadside of one, two, three, four, or more heavy pieces from thirty-two
to one-hundred pounders, from four to twelve or fifteen feet below the waterline,
and retire. Of this whole system of firing cannon, carronades, columbiads,
or ordnance of any kind under water, so as thus to attack an enemy to advantage,
I claim to be the original inventor; and claiming it as my right, I have
deemed it sufficient to give one mechanical and practicable combination,
- being improvements previous to further experiments. But any attempt to
fire any kind of ordnance under water in attacks on vessels of war, or maritime
combat, will be considered a violation of my right and purvey of my invention.
(Signed) ROBERT FULTON.
Fulton had been in America but a few weeks when he collected his papers
and drawings and went to Washington, to urge upon the Government his plan
for torpedo and submarine warfare. He secured a small appropriation, returned
to New York, set up his apparatus on Governor's Island, and prepared to
explain it to the representatives of the army and navy, and such others
as were interested in the subject. He carried out a series of experimental
demonstrations of the value of his inventions, in the course of which he
blew up a vessel provided by the Government for the purpose, in the harbour
of New York, and completely annihilated it, or, as Fulton himself said,
"decomposed" it. Descriptions of his inventions and of his experiments
were, a little later, published by Fulton, in his "Torpedo War,"
a book addressed to the president of the United States and Members of Congress.
The result was that Congress passed an act permitting the extension of these
experiments, and for some years after this date (1810), in fact up to the
time of his death, Fulton was engaged intermittently in the prosecution
of his studies, and in experiments in this direction. A commission was appointed
to witness and report on his work, and Government continued its interest
in the subject to the end.
Reigart says that Chancellor Livingston, after a long examination of each
particular subject which the experiments had suggested, expressed himself
as follows:
"Upon the whole, I view this application of powder as one of the most
important military discoveries which some centuries have produced. It appears
to me to be capable of effecting the absolute security of your ports against
naval aggression, provided that, in conjunction with it, the usual means
necessary to occupy the attention of the enemy are not neglected."
The reports were forwarded to the Secretary of the Navy by Mr. Fulton, with
a letter from himself. His buoyant mind was never to be depressed. He gives
his own views of the experiments, and writes with increased confidence in
his ultimate success. He expresses himself satisfied with the report of
the committee, and thinks their opinions were as favourable to the infant
art as, under the circumstances, could have been expected. It is due to
Mr. Fulton to give some extracts from this letter. He says : - "It
is proved and admitted, first, that the waterproof locks will ignite gunpowder
under water; secondly, it is proved that seventy pounds of powder, exploded
under the bottom of a vessel of two hundred tons, will blow her up; hence
it is admitted, that if a sufficient quantity of powder - and which I believe
need not be more than two hundred pounds - be ignited under the bottom of
a first-rate man-of-war, it would instantly destroy her; thirdly, it is
proved and admitted by all parties concerned in the experiments, that a
gun can be fired under water, and that a cable of any size can be cut by
that means, at any required depth. With these immediately important principles
proved and admitted, the question naturally occurs, whether there be, within
the genius or inventive faculties of man, the means of placing a torpedo
under a ship in defiance of her powers of resistance. He who says that there
is not, and that consequently torpedoes never can be rendered useful, must
of course believe that he has penetrated to the limits of man's inventive
powers, and that he has contemplated all the combinations and arrangements
which present or future ingenuity can devise to place a torpedo under a
ship. I will do justice to the talents of Commodore Rodgers. The nets, booms,
kentledge, and grapnels which he arranged around the 'Argus' made a formidable
appearance against one torpedo boat and eight bad oarsmen. I was taken unawares.
I had explained to the officers of the navy my means of attack; they did
not inform me of their means of defence. The nets were put down to the ground;
otherwise I should have sent the torpedoes under them. In this situation,
the means I was provided with being imperfect, insignificant, and inadequate
to the effect to be produced, I might be compared to what the inventor of
gunpowder would have appeared, had he lived in the time of Julius Caesar,
and presented himself before the gates of Rome with a four-pounder, and
had endeavoured to convince the Roman people that by means of such machines
he could batter down their walls. They would have told him that a few catapultas,
casting arrows and stones upon his men, would cause them to retreat; that
a shower of rain would destroy his ill-guarded powder; and the Roman centurions,
who would have been unable to conceive the various modes in which gunpowder
has since been used to destroy the then art of war, would very naturally
conclude that it was an useless invention; while the manufacturers of catapultas,
bows, arrows, and shields, would be the most vehement against further experiments.
I had not one man instructed in the use of the machines, nor had I time
to reflect on this mode of defending a vessel. I have now, however, had
time; and I feel confident that I have discovered a means which will render
nets to the ground, booms, kentledge, grapnel, oars with sword-blades, through
the port-holes, and all such kinds of operations, totally useless."
The day after this most striking experiment, Mr. Fulton addressed a letter
to the governor, and the mayor, and members of the corporation of New York,
from which the following are extracts:
"Yesterday my desire to satisfy public curiosity at the stated minute
was as great as my never-ceasing anxiety to see our harbours and coast placed
beyond the power of foreign insults, and I lament exceedingly that numbers
were disappointed by the explosion not taking on the first attack, but it
has given me much additional confidence in my engines.
"On taking the torpedoes out of the water, where they had been for
two hours, I found the locks and powder perfectly dry. I immediately discovered
the cause of the failure, which I corrected by placing a piece of quick-match
in the charge which the lock contained. Thus arranged, the fire was communicated
to the seventy pounds of powder in the body of the torpedoes, an explosion
took place, and the brig was decomposed.
"You have now seen the effect of the explosion of powder under the
bottom of a vessel; and this, I believe, is the best and most simple mode
of using it with the greatest effect in marine wars; for a right application
of one torpedo will annihilate a ship, nor leave a man to relate the dreadful
catastrophe. Thus, should a ship-of-the-line, containing five hundred men,
contend with ten good row-boats, each with a torpedo and ten men, she would
risk total annihilation, while the boats under the cover of the night, a'id
quick movements, would risk only a few men out of a hundred.
"When two ships of equal force engage, it may be doubtful which will
gain the victory. Frequently one hundred men are killed on each side, as
many wounded, and the ships much injured; but even the vanquished vessels
will admit of being repaired, and thus the number of ships-of-war is not
diminished, but continue to increase and tyrannize over the rights of neutrals
and peaceable nations.
"Having now clearly demonstrated the great effect of explosion under
water, it is easy to conceive that by organization and practice the application
of the torpedoes will, like every other art, progress in perfection. Little
difficulties and errors will occur in the commencement, as has been the
case in all new inventions; but where there is little expense, so little
risk, and so much to be gained, it is worthy of consideration whether this
system should not have a fair trial. Gunpowder, within the last three hundred
years, has totally changed the art of war, and all my reflections have led
me to believe that this application of it will in a few years put a stop
to maritime wars, give that liberty of the seas which has been long and
anxiously desired by every good man, and secure to America that liberty
of commerce, tranquillity, and independence, which will enable her citizens
to apply their mental and corporeal faculties to useful and humane pursuits,
to the improvement of our country, and the happiness of the whole people."
Colden describes one of these schemes as almost the last work in which the
active and ingenious mind of Mr. Fulton was engaged. This was a project
for the modification of his submarine boat. "He had contrived a vessel
which was to have a capacity, by means of an air-chamber like that which
was in his 'Nautilus,' to be kept at a greater or less depth in the water,
but so that her deck should not be submerged. That chamber communicated
with the water, and was shaped like a diving-bell; but it could at pleasure,
by an air- pump, be exhausted of air, and then it would, of course, fill
with water; or any requisite quantity of air could be forced into it, so
as to expel the water from it entirely. The sides of the vessel were to
be of the ordinary thickness, but her deck was to be stout and plated with
iron, so as to render it ball-proof, which would not require so much strength
as might be at first imagined, because, as no shot could strike it from
a vessel but at a very great angle, the ball would ricochet on a slight
resistance from a hard substance. She was to be of a size capable of sheltering
a hundred men under her deck, and was to be moved by a wheel placed in another
air- chamber near the stern, so that when the vessel was to be propelled
only a part of the under paddles should be in water; at least, the upper
half of the wheel, or more, moving in air. The wheel was to be turned by
a crank attached to a shaft, that should penetrate the stern to the air-chamber
through a stuffing-box, and run along the middle of the boat until it approaches
her bows. Through this shaft rungs were to be passed, of which the crew
were to take hold as they were seated upon each side of it on benches. By
merely pushing the shaft backward and forward the water-wheel would be turned,
and the boat be propelled with a velocity equal to the force of a hundred
men. By means of the air- chamber, she was to be kept, when not in hostile
action, upon the surface, as common boats are; but when in reach of an enemy
she was to sink, so that nothing but her deck would be exposed to his view
or to his fire. Her motion when in this situation would be perfectly silent,
and therefore he called this contrivance a mute. His design was that she
should approach an enemy, which he supposed she might do in fogs or in the
night, without being heard or discovered, and do execution by means of his
torpedoes or submarine guns. He presented a model of this vessel to the
Government, by which it was approved; and under the authority of the Executive
he commenced building one in this port; but before the hull was entirely
finished, his country had to lament his death, and the mechanics he had
employed were incapable of proceeding without him."